<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harlequin Horizons Is No More&#8230;Sort Of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-3929</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2498#comment-3929</guid>
		<description>Anon76, thanks for the link. I went and read Colleen&#039;s blog.

Interesting about the advantage listed above. However, I can&#039;t really say that I blame HQ for still including it. If they do intend to monitor DellArte sales for possible republication, that&#039;s something they would want known to prospective purchasers of their product (by that I mean vanity pubbing). As long as it doesn&#039;t say Harlequin might pick up some books if they sell well enough for DellArte, I&#039;m okay with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon76, thanks for the link. I went and read Colleen&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>Interesting about the advantage listed above. However, I can&#8217;t really say that I blame HQ for still including it. If they do intend to monitor DellArte sales for possible republication, that&#8217;s something they would want known to prospective purchasers of their product (by that I mean vanity pubbing). As long as it doesn&#8217;t say Harlequin might pick up some books if they sell well enough for DellArte, I&#8217;m okay with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon76</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-3928</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2498#comment-3928</guid>
		<description>I found this link interesting. This individual decided to contact Dellarte and recieved an automated response that included a piece of information that is no longer listed on the site (unless I missed it somewhere.)

http://colleenanderson.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/harlequin-begins-vanity-press/

It seems the carrot is still being dangled, but in a slightly different way.

Quoted from the computer generated response:

“Publishing with DellArte Press offers several advantages:
Discovery Opportunities – Titles published through DellArte Press will be monitored for possible pickup by DellArte’s traditional imprints”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this link interesting. This individual decided to contact Dellarte and recieved an automated response that included a piece of information that is no longer listed on the site (unless I missed it somewhere.)</p>
<p><a href="http://colleenanderson.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/harlequin-begins-vanity-press/" rel="nofollow">http://colleenanderson.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/harlequin-begins-vanity-press/</a></p>
<p>It seems the carrot is still being dangled, but in a slightly different way.</p>
<p>Quoted from the computer generated response:</p>
<p>“Publishing with DellArte Press offers several advantages:<br />
Discovery Opportunities – Titles published through DellArte Press will be monitored for possible pickup by DellArte’s traditional imprints”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-3927</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2498#comment-3927</guid>
		<description>Me, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2009/11/25/harlequin-horizons-is-no-more-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-3926</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2498#comment-3926</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, interesting. Still leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Wonder what RWA, SFWA and MWA will do now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, interesting. Still leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Wonder what RWA, SFWA and MWA will do now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
