<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Word About Pacing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2010/02/08/a-word-about-pacing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2010/02/08/a-word-about-pacing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2010/02/08/a-word-about-pacing/comment-page-1/#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2708#comment-4195</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say there&#039;s a lot of backstory in this book, Edie, aside from a few flashbacks that really didn&#039;t need to be in there (in MY opinion). I&#039;ve never read Harry Potter, so I can&#039;t make that comparison, but it sounds like the kind of thing I&#039;m talking about as the way I would have preferred this author to go about things.

The pacing in this novel suffers (to me) more from the aspect of, I did this, then I did that, then I ate this, then I chose that to wear, then a blip of something exciting happened and the reader started the next chapter. Then I did this, and I did that, I ate this, then decided to wear that, then a blip of something exciting happened.... Well, you get the drift. ;) 

I think I&#039;m talking about the long-held recommendation to &quot;leave out the boring parts.&quot; 

Different strokes, though. I read a lot of literary novels, so it&#039;s not like I need action all the time. I guess I just don&#039;t get the purpose or the audience of this novel. For all I know, I&#039;m in the vast minority of reader responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say there&#8217;s a lot of backstory in this book, Edie, aside from a few flashbacks that really didn&#8217;t need to be in there (in MY opinion). I&#8217;ve never read Harry Potter, so I can&#8217;t make that comparison, but it sounds like the kind of thing I&#8217;m talking about as the way I would have preferred this author to go about things.</p>
<p>The pacing in this novel suffers (to me) more from the aspect of, I did this, then I did that, then I ate this, then I chose that to wear, then a blip of something exciting happened and the reader started the next chapter. Then I did this, and I did that, I ate this, then decided to wear that, then a blip of something exciting happened&#8230;. Well, you get the drift. <img src='http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m talking about the long-held recommendation to &#8220;leave out the boring parts.&#8221; </p>
<p>Different strokes, though. I read a lot of literary novels, so it&#8217;s not like I need action all the time. I guess I just don&#8217;t get the purpose or the audience of this novel. For all I know, I&#8217;m in the vast minority of reader responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edie</title>
		<link>http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/2010/02/08/a-word-about-pacing/comment-page-1/#comment-4193</link>
		<dc:creator>Edie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cindyprocter-king.com/blog/?p=2708#comment-4193</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think a lot of backstory is good in any book.  Look at Harry Potter!  All those characters, yet it never felt like it was bogged down by backstory,  If it had been, I would have stopped reading it.  

I can name books in different genres that were part of a series, and they weren&#039;t slowed by backstory.  I have a limited attention span too, and would never have continued to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think a lot of backstory is good in any book.  Look at Harry Potter!  All those characters, yet it never felt like it was bogged down by backstory,  If it had been, I would have stopped reading it.  </p>
<p>I can name books in different genres that were part of a series, and they weren&#8217;t slowed by backstory.  I have a limited attention span too, and would never have continued to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
