Got A Mad-On For Nicholas Sparks?

For every romance writer who currently has a mad-on for Nicholas Sparks because of his perceived arrogance, here’s a link to funny instructions on How to Write a Nicholas Sparks Movie on cracked.com. First, read this quote from The News-Herald Blogs, and then read the funny instructions. Well, I think they’re funny.

Quote from News-Herald Blogs:

“I don’t write romance novels.” His preferred terminology: “Love stories — it’s a very different genre … (Romances) are all essentially the same story: You’ve got a woman, she’s down on her luck, she meets the handsome stranger who falls desperately in love with her, but he’s got these quirks, she must change him, and they have their conflicts, and then they end up happily ever after.”

Mr. Sparks says he doesn’t write romance novels. I’ve never read one of his novels, but I have watched a couple of movie versions, and he’s right. He doesn’t write romance novels. He does write “love stories.” There’s no guarantee that a love story will end happily. Love Story didn’t. Bridges of Madison County didn’t. And neither do Nicholas Sparks’s novels.

Romance novels do end happily.

Wouldn’t it be nice if some “love stories” did? Otherwise, the love stories just get predicable. Don’t they?

Whether Mr. Sparks writes formulaic fiction is something I can’t address with any degree of authority…because I haven’t read his books. I have to admit, though, that having at least one character die at the end of the movie version of every story a writer pens does sound somewhat formulaic to moi.

The article on cracked.com points out several other “essentially the same story”isms. If you need a laugh, check it out.

So, why do you think Nicholas Sparks books get made into movies while the vast, vast, vast majority of romance novels don’t? Is it because people die in his books, so they aren’t “formulaic”? Is it because leaving the audience crying throughout a movie version of one of your books is cathartic for them? Is it because he’s a man writing books mainly intended for a female audience, instead of being a woman writing books mainly intended for a female audience?

I rather think it’s the latter. But then I’m jaded.

Why I Don’t Watch Scary Movies

  1. They scare the crap out of me.
  2. I’m gullible (hence #1).

I should have known better…

Oh, caution. This post is full of spoilers. If you don’t want to read spoilers for the movie, The Fourth Kind, don’t read this post. If you do read this post, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Last week my husband had a birthday. I took him out to dinner to celebrate (and also so  I wouldn’t have to cook). We had a marvelous meal and a marvelous time. When we came home, he wanted to rent a movie. He settled on THE FOURTH KIND. “Okay,” I said. I thought it was a werewolf movie. Humans could be the first kind, vampires the second, something I hadn’t thought of yet could be the third, and werewolves could be the fourth kind. Not so. “The Fourth Kind” refers to alien abductions (as in abducting humans, not getting abducted themselves). We rented it through something called Video on Demand on our PVR, which isn’t a very good service, IMO. Yes, you can pause the movie, but other features are glitchy. I’ll stick to my regular renting channels from now on, thanks.

Back to my point (if I had one). You see, I never watch scary movies because of #1 and #2. I tend to operate under the assumption that people are telling me the truth. Thus, when my husband, at 19, told me he “played the organ,” I thought he meant the muscial instrument. He thought he was being cleverly rude.

Don’t ask me why I thought I could handle a werewolf movie (I can’t). Let’s just say that I love my husband a great deal and wanted to make him happy by watching the movie with him. Of course, he kept falling asleep, leaving me glued to the TV kind of alone.

The Fourth Kind opens with the main actress telling you the story is based on real events, that she’s playing this real person, and that “archival footage” of psychology interview tapes and the like are interspersed throughout the movie along with the dramatic interpretations. Okay, I think, sounds kind of nifty.

The DH should have known better. He’s seen The Blair Witch Project. I haven’t. And I never will.

Basically, the archival footage in The Fourth Kind scared the stuffing out of me. I couldn’t sleep that night, or the next night. Finally, on the third day, I woke up with this niggling suspicion about one of the “archival footage” pieces in the movie. It shows a man killing his wife and committing suicide, and it plays while the dramatic version of the event also plays on a split screen. While watching the movie, yes, it did occur to me that it was odd that the police released this footage to the movie producers, or that extended family would ever allow such a thing. But the movie continued and I bought it all for reasons I won’t go into here. Let’s just say I’ve heard alien abduction stories before.

Upon waking, I ran to “the Google” and searched for whether the “archival footage” in the movie is real. And it’s not.

So there, I’ve ruined the movie for you. However, it might be fun to watch it anyway and laugh and giggle at all the places in the movie, where, in retrospect, the actors are telling the viewer not to believe what they are seeing (but Cindy got mightily scared anyway). Clues are strewn all over the place. However, no way am I watching the movie again to list those clues! Just clicking the link for the movie website and having the little video play scares me. Which is why I’m writing this post in the bright light of day. Even though I now know events in the movie are NOT based on real events that occurred in Nome, Alaska in 2000, my imagination still gets the better of me. And off into dreamland I do not go.

Do you watch scary movies? Have you seen The Fourth Kind? Did you buy into the “archival footage”? Or am I, as they say, a moron?

Brava Contest – Writing with the Stars

As opposed to dancing.

The Kensington Brava line is holding a new writing contest in conjunction with RT BookReviews. Not sure when the contest opens. Details are in the June issue of RT. Alas, I don’t have an RT subscription. For now, you can find a bit of information on the Brava authors blog. Editor Alicia Condon, formerly of Dorchester Publishing (she replaced Kate Duffy at Kensington – R.I.P., Kate), introduces the contest. The comment thread poses some interesting questions about contest eligibility that, as of this typing, haven’t been answered. Keep checking the thread to see if they are. Or…rush out and buy the June RT as soon as you can.

Brava writing contests have launched several careers, including HelenKay Dimon’s. I entered Brava contests when I was eligible, but never fared well in them. As in I never made it to the finals. I could never get past the first round of judges. That didn’t stop Kate Duffy from calling me to discuss ideas, so I must have been doing something right for Brava. Just not right for the preliminary contest rounds.

You know…I still have a requested partial on Kate’s desk. Or whatever became of Kate’s desk. I wonder what will become of it? It was an electronic submission, so might have gone the way of the do-do bird with Kate’s passing. I really should look into that. I’ll put it on my For After I Finish Revising SPIAPT List.

Truth and Fiction

You know that old saying, truth is stranger than fiction? Well, I don’t know about stranger, I think it’s more like wonderful and amazing. Romance author JoAnn Ross recently “met” her long-lost half-sister through, of all places, Facebook. JoAnn did an amazing amount of research to find her lost family. You can read all about JoAnn’s story on her blog.

I’m so happy for you, JoAnn!

Planting Seeds

By Dara Girard

“Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.”

Robert Louis Stevenson

Like any rambunctious two year old, I hate hearing the two-letter ‘N’ word—No. But as a writer, I have heard it often and in many different guises: 

“Your work doesn’t fit our present needs”—which means—“No, we don’t want your story.”

“I don’t feel enthusiastic enough about your novel to offer representation”—which means—”No. I don’t want to work with you!”

“You’re a talented writer, but we are inundated with submissions”—which means—“No, better luck elsewhere.”

“No” scribbled hastily on the same query letter I sent in—which needs no further explanation.

Sometimes these rejections take weeks, sometimes months and sometimes years. Yes, years! I once received a rejection five years after I’d sent my work in. Obviously I’d moved on by then.

But as much as I hate receiving a ‘No’, whether standard or personal, I appreciate the effort someone takes to respond. I absolutely abhor the ones who do not reply. I find no-replies annoying and rude, but that’s the way business is done these days.

I like the quote on the blog Literary Rejections on Display—Remember this: Someone out there will always say no.

Let’s face it, rejection is not fun, especially when it comes in groups or bunches. I tend to get mine in threes. Yep. I call it the ‘Triple Threat’—three rejections (or ‘No thank yous’) in one day.  Unfortunately, it has been a common occurrence in my writing life, and at times it hurts. However, I have come to realize that receiving “No thank you” is part of being in the writing business and don’t let anyone fool you, it is a business.

The writing life is not one of leisure though many films like to end with an author pounding out a story in her spare time then getting a huge advance and movie deal—Fade to Black.

In the real world publishing can be just as cutthroat and competitive as any other business. I found out early on why many talented writers disappear—talent isn’t enough. When I started my little writing enterprise I knew I had many departments, but two were crucial to my survival. One department was Research and Development or R&D, the second was Sales and Marketing (which I occasionally refer to as S&M for many different reasons).

R&D is fun. Ah the joy of creation! S&M is not always fun (clean up your minds). In sales it’s all about business. And any salesperson will tell you that in order to get a sale, you have to get through the many ‘Nos’ to get a ‘Yes’. 

I like the quote by Robert Louis Stevenson because it suits my business. My paternal grandfather was a very successful farmer and I grew up hearing a lot about farming principles. (So much so, that in the third grade I decided I was going to be a farmer by day and chef by night—someone needed to cook the food I planned to grow!) One of my earliest lessons was that farming isn’t an exact science. Crops can get wiped out for many reasons—bad weather, bug infestation, unwanted animals, poor soil, etc.—all of which are out of ones control. That single lesson helped me as a writer.

For those of you who like a stable world, the publishing world isn’t for you. Many authors will tell you, myself included, that in the beginning (and even way beyond the beginning) the writing life might consist of feast or famine. You may get one or two contracts and then nothing else for months or years. You may get excellent royalty checks that suddenly dry up.  I say you ‘may’ because there are always exceptions and those are the ones you read about. More often writers grow their careers through hard work and many books—like authors Dean Koontz and Nora Roberts—before they skyrocket.

These authors knew the key to writing success—planting seeds. Each book, each effort (both visible and invisible) was a seed that they are now harvesting years later.

In the publishing world, there are so many variables that you, as a writer, cannot control. Your actions are all that you can vouch for. My father shared this fact with me when I was about six years old and now I’m telling you—plant your seeds then let go.

You can write a fabulous story or play, but you can’t make it a hit.

You can send out a manuscript or article, but you can’t make it get accepted.

You can write with passion, but you can’t make your work beloved.

You can do your very best, but that doesn’t guarantee that you’ll get rewarded with good reviews or a big royalty check.

But that doesn’t matter because the outcome isn’t the most important thing. It’s the process. Planting seeds is about living in the realm of possibility.

Uncertainty is the writer’s lot, but there is one thing that is certain—if you don’t plant seeds you won’t have a harvest. My grandfather had to plant seeds each and every season in order to have a harvest. He never knew which seeds he would plant would reap the greatest reward, but that wasn’t his concern his job was to plant. So he planted many different crops and did his best.

How does this translate to the writer? Your seeds are your actions. Draft a story idea, submit a query to a magazine editor, write a kind note to a fellow writer, enter a contest, offer a workshop – let your imagination fly. Sometimes you’ll reap a harvest you didn’t expect. A rejection of one idea may lead to the acceptance of another, a much needed critique or more. Remember, you are the master of your own destiny. No matter what happens, no matter how many failures come your way never stop planting. I promise you one day your harvest will be extraordinary.

So, what seeds can you start planting today?

***

Leave a comment or question for Dara to enter to win WORDS OF SEDUCTION. If you’re reading this post through a feed on Facebook, Goodreads, or another social network, please visit the comment trail at www.museinterrupted.com to be eligible for the draw.

To read Dara’s bio and the back cover blurb for WORDS OF SEDUCTION, see yesterday’s post. To learn more about Dara and her books, check out her website at www.daragirard.com.

Dara Girard Guest Blogs Tomorrow!

Tomorrow I’ll welcome Harlequin Kimani author Dara Girard to the blog. Dara’s talking about rejections and is giving away a copy of her March release, WORDS OF SEDUCTION. Please join us.

About WORDS OF SEDUCTION:

From housewife to hot novelist…her real life is igniting more sparks than her stories!

When it comes to disastrous relationships, Suzanne Rand wrote the book. The frumpy-housewife-turned-superstar-author has come home to North Carolina to sell the family house—then hightail it back out of town.

But there’s an unfinished chapter in her life: bad-boy-turned-successful-businessman Rick Gordon. Suzanne’s been burned before and can’t let the roving playboy play fast and loose with her heart again…even if he is the sexiest thing on two legs. And once passion reignites in Rick’s arms, she has no idea where this story’s going…

Rick could write the book on how not to get hooked. But he’s never forgotten Suzanne, and now’s his chance to pick up where they left off. That’s why he’s plotting a course of seduction she’ll never be able to resist. But will their rekindled passion lead to love…and the happy ending they both crave?

About Dara:

Dara Girard is an award-winning author of thirteen novels that feature strong heroines, sexy heroes, family dramas and romance. Her writing has been praised for its deft plot twists, witty dialogue and humor. Find out more on her website: www.daragirard.com