Will You Sleep?

Tomorrow announcements for the Romance Writers of America’s Golden Heart and RITA finalists go out! How many of you who entered will get any sleep tonight?

Ah, I remember the days of entering the GH. I found it very difficult to sleep the night before. Would I get the call? (No, no, no, no, no, no). Would the phone even ring to allow me the thrill of the possibility of the call? (Some years, no, no, no, no; other years, once or twice).

I don’t know about you, but even if I’m not finaling, I WANT the phone to ring a few times just to give me that thrill right before I pick it up. Two years ago, I was down in the basement doing laundry, bemoaning that if I didn’t get a call SOON (taking into account that I knew from the listservs that calls were going out), I wouldn’t get a call at all. Then the phone rang. Upstairs. Don’t ask me why I didn’t take a portable down to the laundry with me. So up the stairs I ran and picked up. As soon as my caller ID’ed herself as being with RWA, I knew. Finally, I’d finaled in the Golden Heart!

This is my second year entering the RITA as Penny and I totally do not expect to final. I don’t know what the stats say, but I personally felt I had a higher chance of finaling in the GH than the RITA, and I entered the GH several times before I did final. I mean, when people with many more books out than I are also entering the RITA, what chance do I stand? And then there’s the fact that Penny writes erotic romance, which doesn’t set well with a portion of the judging population. I’m not whining about that, but it is a fact. However, all contests are subjective and you just never know, right?

Anyway, this is my convoluted way of saying that I’m holding a blog party all day tomorrow to honor and congratulate and cheer on all the Golden Heart and RITA finalists. So if you final, send me an email at cindy AT cindyprocter HYPHEN king DOT com and let me know, and I’ll get your info up lickety-spit. (Visit my Contacts page for a proper email addy). Or drop a note in the Comments trail, and, again, I’ll revise the post to reflect your finalist slot.

Feel free to spread the news.

Okay, now go drink some warm milk and TRY to get some rest, heh, heh.

Post-RITA Reading

RITA and Golden Heart scores are due Monday. Is anyone reading madly through the weekend to meet the deadline?

I entered my RITA panel scores a couple of weeks ago. Since then, I have not read one romance. I think I overdosed during the RITAs, because I honestly could not bear to pick one up. Judging the Golden Heart has never had that effect on me. However, judging a panel of five or six 55-page entries is a much different animal from reading NINE entire novels in the same genre back-to-back in a relatively short time span. No wonder I overdosed.

I found a sparkling gem in my panel. Am eager to see if it makes the cut. How about you? Any gems in your RITA or GH panels?

I’m getting that hankering to dig into my TBR pile again. Yes, I’ve recovered from my post-RITA reading stupor! However, lest you think I didn’t read at all during the last couple of weeks, I have. I’ve read and re-read the scenes I’m currently writing for my WIP. Does that count? And I read two excellent books.

robison_eyeFirst up, LOOK ME IN THE EYE, a memoir by John Elder Robison about growing up with Asperger’s Syndrome.

I first became interested in Asperger’s watching Boston Legal. One of the secondary characters was an Aspergian, and I often wondered if the portrayal was at all accurate.

I greatly enjoyed John Robison’s memoir. I picked it up because I’ve read three of his brother’s (Augusten Burroughs) memoirs, and I thought it would be interesting to read about the same family from a different point of view. John and his brother are several years apart in age, which doesn’t offer quite the same perspective as if the memoirs were written by two siblings, say, two years apart.

But John’s memoir stands on its own. A worthy read. I especially enjoyed the chapters that dealt with his emotional growth and struggles to fit in. Because, to some extent, we all deal with the same issues. There’s a lot to identify with here.

Back cover copy for LOOK ME IN THE EYE:

Ever since he was young, John Robison longed to connect with other people, but by the time he was a teenager, his odd habits—an inclination to blurt out non sequiturs, avoid eye contact, dismantle radios, and dig five-foot holes (and stick his younger brother, Augusten Burroughs, in them)—had earned him the label “social deviant.” It was not until he was forty that he was diagnosed with a form of autism called Asperger’s Syndrome. That understanding transformed the way he saw himself—and the world. A born storyteller, Robison has written a moving, darkly funny memoir about his life that has taken him from developing exploding guitars for KISS to building a family of his own. It’s a strange, shy indelible account—sometimes alien, yet always human.

Woof!

anderson-dargatz_turtleFrom there I moved to TURTLE VALLEY by British Columbia writer Gail Anderson-Dargatz (gotta love that hyphen). I’ve never read Gail’s books before, and TURTLE VALLEY, a gift from my sister-in-law, sat on my bookshelf for two years (as is my way—I like to let my hardbacks “gel”). TURTLE VALLEY is set in an area of British Columbia ravaged by forest fires more than once. I had no idea going into it that it contains a bit of a ghost story. Now, anyone who knows me knows I’m a bit squeamish, however usually ghostly activities in literary novels don’t bother me. But whenever the gas burners popped to life in the middle of the night on the stoves in Gail’s book, I, um, had to put it aside. I quickly learned only to read TURTLE VALLEY during the day. Okay, it’s not the same as reading Stephen King, but I told you I was squeamish! Also, let’s just say I found the characters and the situations she describes all too believable. There’s something about reading a novel set near where you grew up that makes you really feel like you’re there (or maybe that’s more a testament to the author’s talent). Definitely a recommended read.

Back cover copy for TURTLE VALLEY:

The story—of love and land and memory—is propelled by the progress of a forest fire that sends flames raining down from the hills surrounding the peaceful and secluded Turtle Valley. Disillusioned with a marriage that has been severely tested by illness and exhausted by the demands of care-giving, Kat returns to her childhood home with her husband and young son in order to help her aging parents prepare to leave. As she sorts through her parents’ belongings and wrestles with the question of what to save and what to leave behind, Kat finds in her grandmother’s tattered carpet bag a clue to a decades-old family mystery involving the disappearance of her grandfather, John.

As she tries to unravel the tangled threads of her family’s past—urgently, because the fire is starting to move into the valley and authorities have placed area residents on a ten-minute evacuation alert—Kat uncovers the terrifying story of what really happened and discovers startling parallels between her grandmother’s life and her own. As she does so, she also renews an old friendship—with a man who makes her wonder about possibilities she thought were long gone.

Gail’s previous novels include A RECIPE FOR BEES and THE CURE FOR DEATH BY LIGHTNING. I’m looking forward to picking them up.

How about you? Read any good books lately? Want to sell me on them?

2009 Indie Book Awards

Oh, sure, I find about the Indie Book Awards the year I have nothing to enter!

From the website:

The 2009 Indie Book Awards is open to all indie publishers including independent publishers (small, medium or otherwise), university presses, self-published authors, e-book authors, seasoned authors and even first time authors based in the U.S., Canada or internationally who have a book written in English and released in 2008 or 2009 or with a 2008 or 2009 copyright date.

Cash prizes range from $250 to $1000.

Here’s a comprehensive FAQ page and Entry Guidelines.

Entry deadline is March 15, 2009, so get a move-on! And, remember, if you win, the credit goes to…well, okay, you.

Published
Categorized as Contests

Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award

Submissions for the 2009 Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award are running right now, February 2 – 8, 2009. Only three more days to enter, if you’re up for it. Entry details found here.

Entry requirements include:

  • The full/complete version of your manuscript (the “Manuscript”), which must be between 50,000 and 150,000 words;
  • Up to the first 5,000 words, but no less than 3,000 words, of text of that manuscript, excluding any table of contents, foreword, and acknowledgments (the “Excerpt”);
  • A pitch statement (cover letter/summary) of up to 300 word (the “Pitch”)
  • Other registration information as asked for on the entry page (such as name, contact information, book title), and
  • An author photo (if desired), which must be in .jpg format (at least 72 dpi and 500×468 pixels)

That’s from the site. I don’t make this stuff up!

You have to register before you can enter, so if this is the first you’ve heard of the contest, get at ‘er.

Also from the site:

We’re excited to announce that mega-bestselling authors Sue Monk Kidd and Sue Grafton will lead this year’s expert panel, kicking off the Breakthrough Novel Award finalist round with their reviews of the top three manuscripts. A-list literary agent Barney Karpfinger and Penguin Press Editor-in-Chief Eamon Dolan will also join them to provide careful critiques of the finalists’ novels.

Last year my buddy, Maureen McGowan, made it into the quarter finals (or was it further, Maureen? I looked for a search box on your blog, but couldn’t find one). (By the way, thanks for doing away with that um, particular widget we spoke about).

Sourcebooks Pitch Opportunity!

Here’s a great opportunity for unagented writers. On Thursday, January 29th—three days from now—Sourcebooks editor Deb Werksman is accepting 50-word pitches on the Casablanca Authors Blog. Ms. Werksman, along with the Sourcebooks publicist and Casablanca blog authors, will decide on the winner (I hope I got that right), who then gets to submit her/his full manuscript for Ms. Werksman’s consideration with a guaranteed reply within 3-4 weeks.

Believe me, a guaranteed reply in such a short time span is something you want.

You have from one minute after noon January 29th until noon January 30th to post your pitch to the Comments trail of Ms. Werksman’s blog on Casablanca Authors, appearing January 29th. Please note, do NOT post your pitches to THIS blog. You can leave me a note thanking me for telling you about this opportunity (I’d love that), but I can not accept pitches for the contest. If you submit your pitch here, I’ll just have to delete it. And, no, I won’t forward it to Ms. Werksman, either.

Go to the Casablanca Authors blog on January 29th to post your pitches. In fact, there’s a great blog post over there right now that tells you all about the contest rules. Click here to read it.

Please note that Ms. Werksman only wants blurbs for completed manuscripts:

Please enter pitches ONLY for finished, polished manuscripts that are at least 90,000 words in length. No works in progress please.

That’s a direct quote from the Casa Authors blog. So don’t submit a pitch if you’ve finished a manuscript but it’s not the absolute best it can be. Polish that sucker and wait for another opportunity. It does you no good to send in a blurb for non-polished work, because the winner’s name will be announced on the Casa Authors blog February 14th and the winner will then only have until the 16th to submit her/his full manuscript. If your work isn’t polished, it’s not likely you’ll receive an offer of publication, which just wastes everyone’s time.

Details of the Break Up the Winter Doldrums contest are on the Casablanca Authors blog. If you want to enter, please check them out, in case I didn’t get something straight here.

Over and out.

RITA Controversy Makes PW Blog

The controversy about the new “mass-produced” stipulation in RWA’s 2009 RITA contest has reached the Publishers Weekly Blog. Makes for interesting reading, and you can share your views as well, if you wish.

I’m glad the RWA office appears to have clarified the confusion surrounding the return of disqualified books. Yes, they will be returned. From RWA, via the blog :

A rumor is circulating that RWA refused to return disqualified books. That is not true. They have either been returned or are in the process of being returned. The mailing of the RITA books to judges was a priority for the staff, delaying some returns, but any member who contacted the office with this question was told that her books would be returned.

As for returning the entry fees, that’s another issue. When you enter the contest, you sign a box stating you have read the rules. Despite the confusion surrounding the new mass-produced stipulation, it appears RWA is sticking to their guns on this matter.

By the way, a blog post and petition begun by author Kristen Painter led to the Publishers Weekly blog post. You can have a look at Kristen’s petition here. Information about why she felt it necessary to spearhead the petition is on her blog.

There has been talk on one of my chapter forums about whether or not to protest this latest kerfuffle by returning one’s box of RITA or Golden Heart entries, thereby refusing to judge. I do respect individual choices, however, to me, sending back entries as a form of protest hurts the individuals who entered the contests more than it does RWA, and who’s to say that members whose books weren’t disqualified don’t share the same philosophies as members who are considering returning their packet of books? Also, it’s the RWA office staff that then has to run around and find more judges for the returned entries. The staff has nothing to do with the change in rules. However, they must enforce the change.

Every RWA member must make up her own mind how to protest, if indeed she wishes to. For myself, I have no intention of returning my box of RITA books. I do respect the right of others to send back their box of books, however. Meanwhile, I am 2.3 books into judging my packet of 8 or 9 books, and I’m enjoying the process very much.